P-wave duration¶
Column: p_wave_duration_ms · Unit: ms · Measured on: lead II (default)
In one sentence: the P wave is the small bump before the main spike, made by the two upper chambers (the atria) activating; its duration is how long that takes.
Everyday picture
The P wave is the "starter" of each beat: the upper chambers give a small squeeze to top up the lower chambers before the main pump stroke. A longer P wave means the electrical wave takes longer to cross the upper chambers, for example because they are stretched.
Try it¶
Change the width and height of the P wave. Try No P wave too: without it there is nothing to measure.
What to notice:
- The P wave is small, usually well under a quarter of the R spike, so it is the first thing to disappear in noise.
- No P wave means the beat did not start from the heart's normal pacemaker. In real ECGs this happens in some rhythm problems such as atrial fibrillation.
What's typical¶
| P-wave duration | Plain meaning |
|---|---|
| up to about 120 ms (3 small boxes) | typical |
| longer than 120 ms | the upper chambers take longer to activate, often because they are enlarged |
Why it matters for synthetic ECGs¶
The P wave is easy for a generator to get wrong because it is small: it may be missing, smeared into the baseline, or merged into the QRS. A synthetic set that mostly lacks P waves does not represent normal (sinus) rhythm, even if every other part looks right.
How ECGEN-Eval measures it¶
p_wave_duration_ms is the time from P-wave start to P-wave end, median over beats.
NeuroKit2's peak-prominence delineator finds the P wave on every lead. Its start and end are
then moved in to where the wave reaches 15 % of its height, and the leads are combined with
the median.
Needs NeuroKit2 (NaN without it). The P wave is small and its edges are gentle, so this is
the least precise feature: against GE 12SL the typical error is 12 ms (r 0.41), and even two
commercial programs only reach r 0.48 (validation).
Learn more¶
- PR interval: the P wave plus the pause that follows.
- Kligfield et al. (2007), AHA/ACC/HRS Recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram, Part I. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.180200